State of Michigan

 

JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM

governor

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Lansing

REBECCA A. HUMPHRIES

director

 


 

 

BILL ANALYSIS

 

BILL NUMBER:       HB 5867 AS INTRODUCED

TOPIC:                      Requires DNR and DEQ collaborate on the creation of a web site to receive complaints from the public and to post the resolution of the complaint.

 

SPONSOR:              Representative Pastor

CO-SPONSORS:    Representatives Drolet, Garfield, Casperson, Robertson, Voorhees, Palmer, Milosch, and Brandenburg

 

COMMITTEE:           Land Use and Environment

Analysis Done:       June 1, 2004

POSITION

The Department opposes this bill.

PROBLEM/BACKGROUND

We are not aware of the problem being addressed by the bill.

DESCRIPTION OF BILL

The bill would create a single web site which would allow the public to write in complaints regarding the actions of either the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) or the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ).  The complaint would be posted in a public forum and the bill would require the target Department to post the resolution to the complaint in a public forum within 30 days.

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS

Pro

Citizens would have a single place to post complaints regarding these two agencies and would also see the complaints and their resolutions registered by others.

 


 

Con

The system would be redundant considering other Department public contact efforts.  The DNR already hosts a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) link on its web site.  Issues of concern and complaints, as well as general questions about the Department, are submitted here and receive a response from the appropriate Department staff person.  The responses are then available to others logging into the FAQ.  The Department web site also includes a DNR Contact area where phone numbers and e-mail addresses are listed so people can direct specific issues to the appropriate persons within the DNR.

In addition to these electronic, public contact systems, the Natural Resources Commission (NRC) holds monthly meetings with a public comment period as part of the agenda.  In addition to the meetings of the Committee of the Whole, the NRC also holds subcommittee meetings on specific topics.  Many of the Department’s programs that have significant public impact, like the snowmobile and ORV trail programs, have public advisory panels that meet regularly and provide the public an opportunity for input.

These systems provide the public with significant opportunity to address their issues with the DNR. 

Another issue related to this bill is that it links the DNR and the DEQ in a common forum.  These agencies have separate jurisdictions and programmatic responsibilities.  Although the two Departments were separated in 1995, there is still some confusion among the public regarding that separation.  Creating a combined web site will likely promote additional confusion with the public between these agencies.

FISCAL/ECONOMIC IMPACT

Are there revenue or budgetary implications in the bill to the --

(a)     Department

Budgetary:

This bill would cause the Department to incur costs related to the development, maintenance and operation of the site.

Revenue:   

None.

Comments:

The costs related to web development are a concern to all state agencies.  It is difficult to estimate the total costs of developing and maintaining this site at this time.  It would also cause the agency to assign additional staff to reviewing and responding to issues raised on this forum.

 

 (b)    State

Budgetary:

None.

Revenue:   

None.

Comments:

None.

(c)     Local Government

Comments:

None.

OTHER STATE DEPARTMENTS

This bill would also impact the Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Information Technology.

ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

None.

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES IMPACT

None.

 

 

 

_______________________________

Rebecca A. Humphries

Director

 

_______________________________

Date

 

 

 

GCACS